User blogs
Our little hobby is filled with intriguing oddities. One of the most persistent such oddities is our weird tendency to take what is already a fringe subculture and cut it up into further warring fringes.
In the '70s (and even a bit into the '80s) the hobby was divided into the camp of wargamers (themselves divided into board and miniatures camps, not to mention by era) and role-players. This is where I entered the picture, and I came to it from a direction radically different than most RPGers of the time: I came at it from my high school drama flake crowd, not from the wargaming crowd. I especially saw a lot of the disdain hurled at the role-playing fantasists crowd because I not only played them, I exclusively played them and really didn't like wargames.
As the great creative explosion of the '80s began, more and more weird divisions happened, usually in feuding camps based on genre (since most RPGs of the time still lived firmly in their wargaming roots). This was also the era where "realism" vs. "playability" became an argument (despite no RPG ever written being even remotely realistic, and most were only barely playable: this is a hobby that demanded a degree of dedication to enter and be a part of!).
The '90s started to usher in the era of the "story-based" game (although the earliest of these were barely distinguishable in terms of rules focus from Dungeons & Dragons). This is where the largest divide of role-playing games started and what is likely the largest single cultural shift of the hobby began, as typified by the (pretentiously idiotic) phrase "role-playing vs. roll-playing".
The earlier divides were arguments over taste. Something in the loudest of the "story game" crowd stepped over a line from discussions of taste into very literal notions of "wrong fun". In many ways it was the stalwart wargamer crowd's disdain of the role-playing crowd all over again, only it was the newcomers who held the most disdain. The peak of this was likely the essays of people like John Wick or, worse, Ron Edwards who would start bizarrely hinting at (and sometimes openly stating) some kind of moral failing of those who preferred original-style dungeon bashes. It reached the point that to this day I can't stomach the notion of actually buying a product published by some major names in gaming. (And, naturally, because we can't have nice things, a lot of OSR advocates are just as disdainful of people who play differently as are people like the two I named above. I'll just drop James Raggi's name here for that.)
And it was in the midst of this acrimony that sometime in the early '00s the OSR sprung up. (OSR is an initialization I've seen expanded as Old School Revival, Recreation, Renaissance, and other such R words to the point I'm not sure which one is actually canonically correct, so I will just be using OSR.) The OSR is a movement to return back to basics. Back to E. Gary Gygax's original D&D. To return to a time of simplicity. It's a movement born of people wearing pink-tinted contact lenses because—hoo boy!—this is not a good description of the rules of the time!
There is a reason why the original edition of D&D was not the dominant one over the decades and that reason is not just, as has been claimed, a money-grab by TSR and others.
To establish my credentials, I have been playing RPGs of all kinds since 1977. My first exposure to the genre was the 1977 "Blue Book" edition and I have backfilled experience with the original books, not to mention gone forward into both branches of D&D (Advanced and what would later become the Cyclopedia). I played through the explosion of creativity in the '80s, witnessed the rise of story games (playing many of them, though not the White Wolf line of Storyteller games—I hated those), and continued through to the present day where I play intensely story-oriented games (FATE, Spark, Mythic, etc.) as well as some OSR or OSR-alike games (most notably Mazes & Minotaurs). I am emphatically not a young-un telling grandpa what's what. I'm one of the grandparents saying what actually was.
And what actually was was a mess. Don't get me wrong. I don't judge the OSR and, indeed, I like its ideals: simplicity chief among them. I think modern games have gotten ridiculously and pointlessly complicated and as someone who works in marketing, I can even smell the marketing decisions that led to that. I would love to have a game in the old style to play (and indeed do in the form of M&M).
I just don't want to play the original D&D.
So let's talk about why.
I have open on my screen the so-called "White Box" set of rules. The three-volume set of Dungeons & Dragons published by Tactical Studies Rules in 1974 before they even had the TSR logo. (Their logo looked like a bizarre stylized 'K' embedded in a similarly stylized 'G'.) And already we're off to a rocky start. On page 5 of the first book (Men & Magic) we have the recommended equipment which includes ... Chainmail miniature rules, latest edition. Which, note, at the time of publication, wasn't even a TSR product.
Time to open another document. (Picture me rolling my eyes here.)
The current edition of Chainmail at the time would have been 2nd. The third was 1975, a year after D&D was published, while 2nd was 1972. So this is the version we'll go with.
Back to D&D. And here we get to the next problem with this edition of D&D (which I will refer to as OD&D from now on): the writing. It's atrocious. The information design is execrable. Gary Gygax had a large vocabulary, but he had no clue how to use it to deliver information. His writing style lies somewhere between the ponderousness of an academic frightened of clear communication because it would reveal how trivial the ideas under discussion actually are and a middle school essay writer earning his D+ marks throughout the term. On page 6, for example, under the heading of "Characters", he introduces the 3 main classes of characters: Fighting-Men, Magic-Users, and Clerics. Then, buried in the description of what these classes even are, he throws in the fact that fighting men can "include" elves, dwarves, and even halflings while magic-users can only be men and elves with clerics limited to men only.
(From the way it is worded it is easy to mistakenly think that men can only be magic-users and clerics, incidentally.)
In the section on Fighting-Men (referred to multiple times as "fighters" in the text because consistency in game terminology is for cowards?) there's a bizarre section irrelevant to the topic at hand consisting of base income for fighters of high enough a level. In the section outlining Magic-Users there's a sudden table of income costs for making magic items. In the section on Clerics there's more talk of income from high-level clerics and holdings. NONE OF THIS IS RELEVANT. The game is discussing stuff that comes at "end-game" (so to speak) for characters before they've even actually finished off what a character is and how to make one! It's very clearly written stream-of-consciousness and it's a chore to decode. THIS is why the Basic line was started and expanded into the Cyclopedia. Gary Gygax's writing style is just not suited to actually explaining things!
And it continues on and on in this vein: opening up with the classes, introducing the classes, and mentioning races only in passing, suddenly, on the very next page, right after talking about Clerics, races are introduced at the same heading level in a jarring transition. Each is defined solely by what it can and cannot do. There's no explanation of what a "dwarf" or "elf" or "halfling" really is. Maybe that's what you need Chainmail for? Yep. That's where the races are described. (Though there's no "halflings". Only hobbits.) Further the races' advantages and abilities are explicitly specified in Chainmail. You really do need Chainmail to play OD&D!
Alignment is handled in the same kind of slap-dash way: character types are defined by alignment, but alignment itself is not described (not even in Chainmail!).
This mess goes on and on. There's rules for changing character classes that reference prime requisites, but prime requisites for classes haven't yet been defined! (They do have the decency to forward-reference this, but this is utter crap information design. We've known how to write better than this for centuries before D&D was written!)
Once you do decode this, the rules for making characters are, indeed, very simple. It's just that the writing is so phenomenally bad that D&D rapidly became known as a game that you couldn't just buy and learn. You had to have it taught to you.
And one of the purported advantages of the aulde skool rears its ugly head here: it is explicitly intended (according to the introduction) to be merely guidelines. So what you were taught wouldn't transfer well to other groups…
Of course when you played, again you needed Chainmail according to the rules thus far. We're on page 18 of the rules and half the rules mentioned explicitly call out to Chainmail for resolution. Page 19 introduces the "alternative" combat system that replaces Chainmail's in which we see the beginning of the THAC0 system that was so beloved in later years. And again it's incoherent dross. The hit table only applies to fighters. Magic-Users and Clerics use different progressions mentioned in an asterisked footnote. This is also where the infamously bizarre categories of saving throws make their first appearance. To this day I don't understand these categories, why they were made, what they were intended to represent. I only know that it was really weird seeing rules in later editions say "save vs. paralyzation" for things that had nothing to do with paralyzation, just because those were the numbers the designer of the monster or trap or whatever liked best.
And of course the saving throw matrix manages to be incoherent there as well, interlacing levels and classes in bizarre ways making it awfully hard to figure out which is which when using it.
Anyway, I think I've made my point here. The rules were awful. They were incoherently written. They relied on an outside book (then published by another publisher!) to actually use. And on top of everything else, they covered so very little that, quite ironically, to use them meant the referee (DM being a later term!) had to make things up on the fly all the time. Just like the "GM fiat" games that many OSR advocates deride now.
They're god-awful rules!
And note, I'm not saying here that the rules should cover every possible contingency. In that direction lies madness (also known as Chivalry & Sorcery)! But what the rules should provide (and emphatically don't!) is a coherent framework for adjudication.
Now D&D has an excuse. It was the first game of a kind nobody had ever seen before. Dave Arneson and Gary Gygax deserve the accolades they get for having made it and popularized it. I will never cast shade on the giants who made the very hobby I love so well! But I absolutely will cast shade on the people who think that OD&D was the best of all possible times to the point of wanting to return to it.
Not casting shade in the "wrongfun" sense either, but rather in the "are you really sure?" sense. Because yes, there is a lot of the OSR vibe I love. I just don't like the game at the core of it and I think an attempt to return to that in specific, even if rewritten to be more coherent, is doomed to failure. I think there is room for the OSR concept: simple, fun-focused, hack-and-slash or exploration-oriented, pick-up-and-play games that also have room for depth and soul but that don't have a need for the millions of pages of rules for every contingency. For the concepts behind D&D, but concepts executed with now nearly 40 years of design experience to get it right.
Here's four webcomics that I like and some of them even have something to do with gaming.
I don't like rom com movies much. In fact I don't like movies much. I prefer my TV in small doses. But I do read a lot of coming of age fantasy and science fiction which is kind of close to rom coms. Especially "The Wheel Of Time" which I am definitely planning on rereading, all 14 volumes.
But it turns out that I like rom com webcomics. I guess the dosage is about right.
"Questionable Content" is alternative history science fiction. It's present day but in the recent past Hannelore's dad discovered true AI and built it into robots. So it's a rom com with robots. (Shades of Isaac Asimov) It's actually my current fav and it turns out I must have started it in the middle because when I went to episode 1 to link here I hadn't read it. But there is an AI robot right at the start. Plus rom com. It is a lot different than the more recent episodes but I'm restarting at the top and you can too.
https://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1
Oh yeah, it's drawn by J. Jacques. And it's 5 days a week.
Dumbing Of Age is a College Webcomic by David M. Willis. This is my latest fav and it's actual contemporary fiction rom com. It has more about cartoons than about games although D&D does get an occasional mention. Big on superheroes too with an actual superhero character who is actually just a shy girl with tendencies towards violence.
7 days a week. Yaaaaaay!
https://www.dumbingofage.com/2010/comic/book-1/01-move-in-day/home/
The absolute best webcomic ever is all about D&D with in jokes right from the first episode. The Order Of The Stick is about an adventuring party drawn as stick figures. If you haven't already read this it's a treat. The only bad thing about it is that it's a weekly so I save it for my weekend reading. It's by Rich Burlew.
https://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0001.html
And my new find is Gunnerkrigg Court. It's also in a school setting but so far not a rom com. Definitely fantasy and I'm not far enough into it to tell you much more. Except that I like it so far. Not sure of the publishing schedule but the art is great and it's drawn by Tom Siddell.
https://www.gunnerkrigg.com/?p=1
Please add your favorite webcomics in the comments. Especially if they are about gaming.
Thanks
JesseQ made a post about how he would use multiple free online tools for online gaming. I have been wanting to set up an Actual Play podcast as a Gamer+ event and JesseQ's post got me thinking. Here's his out of the box suggestions.
Discord for chat (text, video, voice)
Miro for shared whiteboard/tabletop
Watch2Gether for atmosphere/music
I have come up with another platform set.
Discord - Tenkar's Tavern in particular for the chatroom/game table
Web Whiteboard - A whiteboard app on the web the DM could use for drawing maps or diagrams for online games. You can also post text and pictures. Players can also post, make map annotations during play, upload something they saw, etc.
File Downloads - My Pydio instance does this great. There are many other free web alternatives.
So the only barrier to participation is getting into Tenkars Tavern on Discord. Discord has become a new standard for voice chat and their apps are easy to install and work on every platform.
Once you are in the gamerplus chatrooms at Tenkar's Tavern the DM can post a link to the whiteboard set up for this game. The players click on this link and they are there on the whiteboard. No passwords or accounts required.
The DM can also post a link to a folder on Pydio. The players can follow this link, browse pregens, and download or print the character sheet they choose to play. The DM has a different link that allows uploading and file deletion. Again no install, passwords, or accounts required.
And this is the key. Follow the link and you're in.
You enter the chatroom. The DM posts a link and you go pick a character. When the DM starts to draw something he posts a link. You follow the link and view what he's drawing. It would even be possible to lay out battle maps and move player tokens on the map.
So these two apps, the whiteboard and the file manager, are both included in Miro as per JesseQ's suggestion. There is an advantage to having these both in one app. But Miro is more complicated to use and the DM would have to send player invites which means collecting emails. In some situations this would not be cumbersome but for Gamer+, If You Play You Win, actual play podcasts I wanted it to be as easy as possible to jump into the game.
As JesseQ suggests, Gamer+ has set up a Watch2Gether channel that the DM could use for Monster noises and appropriate background music. It is also available for listening on the public web just by linking in with no password or account necessary.
So this is just another possible way to set up for online gaming. I chose these apps because of their open availability to anyone without having to install apps or create accounts. There might be better choices for your games or campaigns. Please leave your ideas in the comments.
Thanks
I'll try a few posts, and I'll see what happens. Some will be reposts from the current NUELOW Games blog, some will be new. Some may even be reposts from my long-time favorite blog, Shades of Gray.
Meanwhile... if anyone sees this, please let me know. Is it worth it for me to post here?
Today's game is The Terran Trade Authority Roleplaying Game (henceforth TTARPG – and yes there's a reason why I'm using such a clunky initialization) released by Canada's Morrigan Press in 2006. It's a science fiction RPG that …
Let's roll back the history a bit, because this is really unusual.
History
In 1978, Hamlyn Publishing released a book called Spacecraft 2000-2100 AD by Stewart Cowley. It was a large, hardback art book filled to the brim with science fiction artwork of spaceships, planetscapes, and future cities/bases that were rendered by some of the greatest SF artists of the time: Angus McKie, Gerard Thomas, Chris Foss, Peter Elson, and others represented by J.S. Artists.
More than an art book, however, it was also a detailed future history with little vignettes of space battles, a future history, etc. all paired with pictures showing the subject. It was a brilliant concept that was well executed, leading to more books in the series authored by Cowley—Great Space Battles (1979, with Charles Herridge), SpaceWreck: Ghostships and Derelicts of Space (1979), Starliners: Commercial Travel in 2200 AD (1980).
All of these books were tied together in a future history involving the name of the Terran Trade Authority (TTA) hence the name of the RPG.
... more
But this one is different.
... more
Therein lies the crux of the matter.
May the Schwartz be with you.
Today's review is gong to be from the person I consider the James Brown of game design. Which is to say the hardest-working man in game design. His name is Greg Porter and he is the owner (and sole member) of the game producer BTRC (Blacksburg Tactical Research Center). Neither he, nor his company, are likely names you know … but you should. In his own, quiet way, Greg Porter has created some of the most interesting, most innovative, and most playable RPGs out there.
(Of course he's also created some of the most unplayable games as well…)
... more
https://gamerplus.org/user/Alan
Inspired Unreality open game chat is held every Monday night at 9:00 Central in the gamerplus chatrooms at Tenkar's Tavern on Discord. If you've never been to Tenkar's Tavern we have an invite for you here.
https://gamerplus.org/index
Ryan at Aqualith Media has posted a blog about his new website and his desire to collaborate with game creators.
https://gamerplus.org/blogs/678
Follow Me And Die has posted about his adventures in computer building. He is hoping that upgrading his system will help with editing his Youtube videos.
https://gamerplus.org/newsfeed/3709
Into dice? Into dichroic prisms? ZDL says " These are dice cut from dichroic prisms." And she posted a picture of some very pretty dice.
https://gamerplus.org/newsfeed/3702
Have you been noticing my fediverse address below? Have you heard of Mastodon, Friendica, or Pleroma? How about Funkwhale or Peertube? The fediverse is a decentralized social network made up of many people running many programs on their computers all cooperating so you can send and receive posts cross platform. Like email. Except social.
Visit my Friendica, social networking on the fediverse.
https://curators.mixremix.cc
Thanks,
Hairy Larry
https://gamerplus.org/user/hairylarry
hairylarry@curators.mixremix.cc
hairylarry@deltaboogie.com
No history of RPGs would ever be complete without discussion of Iron Crown Enterprises' Rolemaster line of game products. Despite its many epithets (most notably Chartmaster)—whether justly or unjustly applied (and I feel largely unjustly!)—it is hard to deny the influence this game had on role-playing games in general and D&D in specific. First published in 1980 with the first component, Arms Law (a naming convention that set the table for all of the line), it began its existence as a replacement weapon/melee combat system for AD&D. (They couldn't state it that flatly, of course, for reasons of copyright, so it was "for RPGs".) It was rapidly followed with Claw Law (later packaged together) which added creature and unarmed combat to the mix. This was followed by Spell Law for magic and finally, in 1982, Character Law, turning Rolemaster from a set of supplements into its own independent role-playing game. 1984's Campaign Law was the final component (and one of the earliest guidebooks for world-building for GMs).
... more
Tag Search
Tags
Users
